This was cross-posted on The Asexual Agenda.
This is a silly observation only I would ever make.
Every physicist should know that frequency and time are complementary
variables. They’re related by an uncertainty principle, similar to the
uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics governing position and
momentum. The more precisely you know the position of a particle, the
less precisely you can know its momentum. The more precisely you know
its momentum, the less precisely you can know its position.
Likewise, if you want to precisely know the frequency of something,
you have to average over a long period of time. If you want to know how
the frequency changes over short timescales, you must accept an inherent
uncertainty in the frequency.
One of the ways in which people are different from each other is in
how frequently they’re sexually attracted to other people. However, our
sexualities are not always constant throughout our lives. Therefore, you
can describe (one aspect of) sexuality with a frequency, and you can
say that this frequency changes over time.
But there’s a fundamental limitation to how precisely you can know
frequency and time together. If you want to talk about how someone’s
frequency of attraction varies from year to year, then it is impossible
to pin down this frequency with precision greater than once a year.
Mostly, this doesn’t matter. If you’re attracted to about ten people a
year, then what does it matter if you’re not sure if it’s actually nine
or eleven people a year? Who can even count up that high anyway?
However, if you’re very infrequently attracted to people, and
experience high fluidity, then we enter what I’m going to call the
quantum sexuality regime. Here, the fluidity uncertainty principle
reigns.
Wednesday, September 11, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment