- Premise 1: Not P is true.
- Conclusion 1: "If P, then Q" is true, by Premise 1.
- Premise 2: P is true.
- Conclusion 2: Q is true, by Conclusion 1 and Premise 2.
And so, when you hear about a "different kind of truth", which includes statements that are both true and false, the claim is, on the face, very problematic. Perhaps we're talking about a kind of truth which does not operate by logic. If so, it probably doesn't deserve to be called a truth; it should be called something like "truthiness". Or perhaps it only appears that there are statements that are both true and false within the same system. In other words, the contradiction is an illusion, and therefore not something "deep".
0 comments:
Post a Comment